34 thoughts on “Placement-A IQ Test

  1. hi,
    I liked this test but it seems far too easy, are you going to put new iq 170-180 tests online this year? And how about no Raven matrices but analogies, verbal, spatial and logic tests instead?
    and by the way although i did reach iq180 on the numerical test, i wonder about question 25 (answer is 57 if i remember well) because i’d like to see your explanation on the logic involved which in my opinion is quite fuzzy…
    Thank you anyway for the nice cerebral training.
    Sam

    • Matrix is a good way to measure IQ but many people are accustomed to these items and it is difficult to create new rules.
      I am not able to create verbal test.
      « Analogies + Spatial + Logic » can really make an interesting test.

  2. Parece que só tem gênios fazendo testes aqui. Ou… mentirosos. Aliás, a Internet é o paraíso dos mentirosos. Todos afirmando que tem Q.I. de 150, 160, 170, achando que os testes daqui são fáceis demais. Não são, pelo menos pra mim, não, que não sou nenhum tolo. Este Placement A, pelo que eu notei, se a pessoa acertar 10 perguntas, teria 120 de Q.I., 11, 125, 12, 130, e assim por diante. Consegui o máximo que tive em outros 4 testes Nicologic: 130.

    • Os testes não são todos fáceis mas são as pessoas com alto QI que normalmente se interessam por este tema…é normal as altas pontuações.

  3. Tem razão. Ainda bem que num dos testes considerados mais difíceis, o Flip A, eu fui bem, 132, na primeira vez. Estranhamente, no Dominós, na primeira vez, eu fiz apenas 103, me confundi com as cores, me guiei por elas.

    • I received your payment (sorry for the late) and I just sent you the code. Enjoy !

      Rem : if an user do not receive automatically the code, he must write me with the e-mail found in the payment process.

  4. hey,
    do you plan to implement your test list with a very hard IQ 180+ test ?
    that would be great…
    so long, and keep your lamp burnin’
    sampilgrim

    • For now, I just would like to understand why my Logic-C is so hard !? This test appears much more difficult than the others but frankly I do not see why.

      • ok, the answer is : there’s a mistake in item 10, if x and y are in right colors in column c3, then only can you say that only x or y is in reverse color in line l1 but not both of them
        so getting a 9/10 is worth IQ160+

        • Logic-C Item 10
          L1 and C3 lead to nothing.
          This item admits a logical solution. Please re-read carefully the indications.

          • Hi again, thank’s for answering , i think you’re right, i’d rather look at c5-l1 to get the good answer
            All my best and…think about the super 180+IQ test which will get you loads of brainiacs (all my friends from Torr.org for exemple)
            sampilgrim

  5. how do i find the IQ overall ranking ? As my name dopes not appear on the list although i have taken 4 tests

    • Button A takes the first object with the color of the second object.
      Button B does the contrary.

      • Thanks!
        I was not expecting this reasoning, as I thought that button A was a ‘coded’ object unveiled in the the reply options (thus a red circle) and similarly with button B (a yellow circle). Including these ‘uncoded’ objects in the matrix drove me crazy..

  6. Bonjour,
    Dans Placement-A :
    A la question 11, les réponse A et D sont identiques mais la bonne réponse est D

  7. Hello, first of all, great website , thank you for all the work you had to put in. I made now several tests and i understand very clearly that i am not that intelligent according to your tests, i simply do not understand some questions. So, my question is , is there somewhere an explanation why it is like so and so, why is this pattern logical to that pattern and so on. Because i want to understand why i do not understand. Thanks. Marcus

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse de messagerie ne sera pas publiée.

Vous pouvez utiliser ces balises et attributs HTML : <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>